ࡱ> 352 bjbj 4 0:KKKKJJJ:<<<<<<$6`JJJJJ`KKuvvvJKK:vJ:vvvK ^`v&0vvvvx8JJvJJJJJ``vJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ :  HYPERLINK "http://www.economist.com/blogs/theinbox/2008/07/what_a_way_to_run_the_world_ju.cfm" What a way to run the world First published in the Economist, July 2008 SIR - You ask if it is time for a cull of international organisations (HYPERLINK "http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11670305"What a way to run the world, July 5th). My response: no - time for Europe. On the IMF, you correctly call for the ins to open up to the outs. However, the block is not, as you suggest, the United States, but Europe. The fund is losing its legitimacy because the Europeans (the British) and even the euro area (the Belgians) doggedly refuse to coalesce into the single seat that their economic intimacy demands, and the logic of what the IMF actually does suggests. This would free up the seats needed to hotwire the BRICs into the international economic infrastructure it is in our interests to maintain, but which is dwindling to irrelevance. This would not be to Europes detriment: united, the euro areas voting weight at the IMF would surpass that of the United States. Nowhere more than at the fund was Tony Blair right that a single-power world is inherently unstablethats the rationale for Europe to unite. When we work together, the EU can stand on par as a superpower and a partner with the US. Baron Frankal Manchester First published in the HYPERLINK "http://www.economist.com/blogs/theinbox/2008/07/what_a_way_to_run_the_world_ju.cfm"Economist, 24 July 2008 [click pressing cntrl to navigate] ab~D E ` a S 绩n]UQU666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH J`J aGNormal dCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA`D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List .X. 0@Emphasis6]VV 0 timestamp1 dCJOJPJQJ^JaJtH 6U@6 0 Hyperlink >*B* ph3fFV!F =;0FollowedHyperlink >*B*phPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]   S   aD`vXXX\(# AA@0(  B S  ?M ) 99SR[{>( ) @SR[ff+k+kM=;w=aG}Y|"t095@`@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.{ @CalibriACambria Math"1h t t+ + !02HX  $P02!xxB&BB&BOh+'0 px  B&BNormalB&B2Microsoft Office Word@F#@B^@B^+՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|     Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSAxiShttp://www.economist.com/blogs/theinbox/2008/07/what_a_way_to_run_the_world_ju.cfm\dDhttp://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11670305\iShttp://www.economist.com/blogs/theinbox/2008/07/what_a_way_to_run_the_world_ju.cfm\  !#$%&'()+,-./014Root Entry F^6Data  1TableWordDocument4SummaryInformation("DocumentSummaryInformation8*CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q